A Fresh Look at Bring Your Own Device (BYOD): Part II


This is the second part of a two-part blog examining the evolving nature of enterprise mobility and how recent advances are prompting enterprises and end users to consider complements or alternatives to BYOD. While Part I explored the topic from an IT perspective, Part II considers how the evolution of enterprise mobility is impacting end users.  

15291_work and playBYOD is largely a behavior-driven trend.  It came about when end-users were driven to utilize their own devices for work due to limitations on the personal use capabilities of corporate-issued devices, as well as privacy concerns. Those users who found corporate-issued smartphones or tablets satisfactory for their “off-duty” communications needs were often turned off by fear that personal information, such as photos and private email accounts, could be deleted or perused by the IT department or other entities within the organization.

For employees, especially those wanting a single device for work and personal activities, BYOD made great sense – even if it meant footing the bill for the smartphone and the accompanying service. But those conditions are so 2009! The modern day office worker is now met with a set of mobility options and conditions that are completely different from those faced by his or her counterpart of just a few years ago.

For starters, technology advances in the enterprise mobility management (EMM) space, specifically containerization, has largely solved employees’ privacy and data loss issues. Though not all EMMs are created equal, many offer application management capabilities that make it possible for IT to oversee (and wipe, if necessary) only work-related data, leaving the employee with complete reign over the remainder of the device. The BlackBerry Balance containerization solution has been recognized by industry analysts as offering market-leading work/personal management capabilities.

Enterprise IT departments have leveraged these capabilities to expand the flexibility of their device management policies, applying containerization and other modern EMM approaches to include personal communications and computing activities on corporate issued devices. (See the whitepaper Making the Case for COPE for a detailed discussion of corporate mobile device policies.) Despite the lingering and dated association of corporate-owned smartphones and tablets with business-only device policies, enterprises are now able to support a broad range of policies that span the entire lockdown-to-BYOD spectrum.

In fact, device ownership has largely been eliminated as a functional consideration. Corporate-owned policies, including COPE (Corporate Owned, Personally Enabled) and CYOD (Choose Your Own Device), now possess the flexibility to provide employees with essentially the same user experience, privacy and autonomy they are accustomed to on their own devices. Legal liability, accordingly, is now the major difference between corporate-issued and personal devices used in the workplace.

This reality radically changes the relationship between employees and their mobile devices, specifically the employee’s perceived need to own the device and incur monthly charges for voice and data. I don’t know about yours, but my inbox gives me access to newly commissioned BYOD surveys nearly every day. The preponderance of the data I’ve seen indicates that the major drivers behind BYOD are device preference and greater control of personal data. My guess is that if those requirements could be satisfied through a corporate-issued device policy, a large percentage of employees would be perfectly content to cede ownership rights to their employers.

The bottom line is that selecting an optimal device management policy is a complex undertaking for nearly any organization, which must consider a range of factors, including costs, security, legal risks and user satisfaction. But for a business that prefers to address the mobility requirements of at least a portion of its workforce with a corporate-owned approach — due to legal, regulatory or even expense considerations — fear of failing to meet the usability and productivity needs of most users is now a thing of the past.

And speaking of the past, isn’t it time for a fresh look at BYOD?


About Joe McGarvey

An Enterprise Mobility Strategist at BlackBerry, McGarvey has covered the enterprise and telecommunications industries for more than 20 years as both a journalist and analyst. He is best-known as a long-time principal analyst at leading market research firm Current Analysis. McGarvey has also been an analyst for Heavy Reading and an editor at several leading technology magazines.

Join the conversation

Show comments Hide comments
+ -
  • http://bizblog.blackberry.com/2014/04/two-key-ways-that-cope-helps-guard-against-enterprise-mobility-litigation/ COPE Helps Guard Against Enterprise Mobility Litigation | Inside BlackBerry for Business Blog

    […] and personal life, boundary-defining litigation is likely to increase. As the legal dust settles, a Corporate-Owned, Personally Enabled (COPE)  approach to enterprise mobility management could provide organizations with several solutions for […]

  • http://bizblog.blackberry.com/2014/05/keeping-up-with-byod/ Keeping Up with BYOD | Inside BlackBerry for Business Blog

    […] amount of conclusion jumping. BYOD scenarios that call for employees to assume 100% of the expense of operating mobile devices for work can assist businesses in cutting down telecom costs. But that scenario is rare. Businesses […]

  • http://www.cnbbdevgroup.com/cn/?p=18571 紧跟BYOD | 中国黑莓开发网

    […]   也许大多数的自带设备办公(BYOD)运动的Kardashian质量都不高,导致了很多不同的结果。自带设备办公(BYOD)方案要求员工100%承担使用移动设备的费用,这可以帮助企业降低通信成本,但是这种情况很少见。企业会周期性的报销员工因工作相关产生的费用,如计算和通信费用,这个比他们报销与承运人有关的业务关税要快得多。 […]

  • http://bizblog.blackberry.com/2014/07/container-tech-benefits/ Container Technology Brings Benefits beyond Data Leak Prevention | | Inside BlackBerry for Business Blog

    […] could also assist IT administrators in overcoming the reluctance of end users to submit their personal devices to IT oversight. End-user tendency to shy away from IT creates a breeding ground for data leakage, as unmanaged […]

  • http://www.cnbbdev.com/?p=19176 除却数据泄漏预防,集装化技术带来的利好 | 中国黑莓开发网

    […]    移动设备集装化也可以帮助IT管理员解决终端用户不愿意提交他们的个人设备进行IT监督的难题。终端用户都倾向于避开IT部门,正是这样做,无形中建立了一个数据泄露的温床。因为不受管理的员工智能手机,平板甚至是笔记本电脑会加载上企业的数据和应用,使用的却是基于消费型社交网络、通讯、文件共享和其他基于互联网的数据泄漏通道。 […]

  • http://bizblog.blackberry.com/2015/05/why-good-enough-security-is-a-poor-recipe-for-great-business/ Why “Good Enough” Security is a Poor Recipe for Great Business | Inside BlackBerry for Business Blog

    […] term “good enough” security emerged during the recent surge of consumerization of IT as a way for mobile vendors to justify the use of smartphones that couldn’t clear the enterprise […]

  • http://bizblog.blackberry.com/2015/06/protecting-corporate-assets-how-can-cios-take-control-of-byod/ Protecting Corporate Assets: How Can CIOs Take Control of BYOD? | Inside BlackBerry for Business Blog

    […] Consumerization and BYOD trends have brought a thick layer of fog to Corporate Security Officers as well. And this is happening right when we have a steady influx of emerging cyber threats that pose real risk to business. CISOs are aware that business shareholders will not stand for impaired productivity nor high risk of financial or reputation damage due to unmanaged security risks, yet their voice may not be heard at the board level. You might be surprised to hear that many corporate boards are unaware of how mobility choices made lower in the organization affect the corporate risk posture. […]

blog comments powered by Disqus